Convene a virtual panel of domain experts

Pose a technical problem — a corrosion mechanism, an EIS interpretation, a materials selection question. A panel of AI specialists discusses it among themselves, bringing different domain perspectives to the same question.

Beta — feedback from domain experts welcome.

How it works

Pose your problem

Describe the technical question, data, or hypothesis you want the panel to examine

Select your panel

Choose from platform experts (corrosion, EIS, materials science) or add custom experts you have built from your own literature

Watch the discussion unfold

The experts discuss among themselves — different interpretations, contrasting evidence, flagged points of genuine disagreement

When to use it

Not for simple lookups — for complex, contested, or multi-angle problems where a single perspective is not enough

Stress-test your interpretation

Present your EIS data interpretation or corrosion mechanism hypothesis to the panel and watch the experts interrogate it from different angles

Example questions:

•"Is my Warburg assignment justified given the system geometry?"

•"Does this pitting potential trend support my passivation model?"

•"What am I missing in this failure analysis?"

Explore cross-disciplinary connections

Surface insights that a single-perspective approach would miss — when corrosion, electrochemistry, and materials science specialists discuss together, unexpected connections emerge

Example questions:

•"How do microstructural features interact with the electrochemical response?"

•"What inhibitor mechanisms are consistent with both the impedance data and the surface chemistry?"

•"Where do coating degradation mechanisms overlap with local corrosion?"

Think through a hard problem

Before a meeting, a paper, or a supervisor conversation — convene a panel discussion to surface what you have not considered

Example questions:

•"I have two plausible circuit models — which is more physically meaningful?"

•"Why would this system show anomalous impedance at low frequency?"

•"What experiments would distinguish between these two mechanisms?"

Why a panel, not a single expert

Complex technical problems are rarely best served by a single authoritative answer. A panel surfaces the landscape of reasonable interpretations.

Multiple expert perspectives, not one answer

Different experts may weight evidence differently, emphasise different aspects, or reach different conclusions. The disagreement is the point — it surfaces what a single opinion would flatten.

Experts discuss among themselves

You pose the problem. The panel discusses it. You observe and participate. The format is a discussion, not a Q&A — experts respond to each other, not just to you.

Platform and custom experts

Use the platform's built-in domain experts, or include custom experts you have built from your own literature — your specialists joining the broader panel.

Not a replacement for peer review or expert consultation — but useful for thinking through a problem, surfacing what you have not considered, and seeing how a technically sophisticated panel would respond to your question.